Critique of Judgment Including the First Introduction

includes index and biblioraphy

CRITIQUE OF JUDGMENT Of the division of philosophy Of the realm of philosophy in general Of the critique of judgment as a means of com¿bining the two parts of philosophy into a whole Of judgment as a faculty legislating a priori The principle of the formal purposiveness of nature is a transcendental principle of judg¿ment Of the combination of the feeling of pleasure with the concept of the purposiveness of nature Of the aesthetical representation of the pur¿posiveness of nature Of the logical representation of the purposive-ness of nature FIRST PART. CRITIQUE OF THE AESTHETICAL JUDGMENT FIRST DIVISION. ANALYTIC OF THE AESTHETICAL JUDGMENT FIRST BOOK. ANALYTIC OF THE BEAUTIFUL FIRST MOMENT OF THE JUDGMENT OF TASTE, ACCORDING TO QUALITY The judgment of taste is aesthetical . The satisfaction which determines the judg¿ment of taste is disinterested The satisfaction in the pleasant is bound up with interest The satisfaction in the good is bound up with interest . Comparison of the three specifically different kinds of satisfaction SECOND MOMENT OF THE JUDGMENT OF TASTE, ACCORDING TO QUANTITY The beautiful is that which apart from con¿cepts is represented as the object of a universal satisfaction . Comparison of the beautiful with the pleas¿ant and the good by means of the above characteristic . The universality of the satisfaction is repre¿sented in a judgment of taste only as subjective . Investigation of the question whether in a judgment of taste the feeling of pleasure precedes or follows the judging of the object THIRD MOMENT OF JUDGMENTS OF TASTE ACCORD¿ING TO THE RELATION OF THE PURPOSES WHICH ARE BROUGHT INTO CONSIDERATION IN THEM Of purposiveness in general The judgment of taste has nothing at its basis but the form of the purposiveness of an object (or of its mode of representation) The judgment of taste rests on a priori grounds The pure judgment of taste is independent of charm and emotion ....... Elucidation by means of examples . The judgment of taste is quite independent of the concept of perfection ..... The judgment of taste, by which an object is declared to be beautiful under the condition of a definite concept, is not pure .... . Of the ideal of beauty ....... FOURTH MOMENT OF THE JUDGMENT OF TASTE, ACCORDING TO THE MODALITY OF THE SATIS¿FACTION IN THE OBJECT What the modality in a judgment of taste is The subjective necessity which we ascribe to the judgment of taste is conditioned . The condition of necessity which a judgment of taste asserts is the idea of a common sense Have we ground for presupposing a common sense? The necessity of the universal agreement that is thought in a judgment of taste is a sub¿jective necessity, which is represented as objective under the presupposition of a common sense GENERAL REMARK ON THE FIRST SECTION OF THE ANALYTIC SECOND BOOK. ANALYTIC OF THE SUBLIME . Transition from the faculty which judges of the beautiful to that which judges of the sublime SECOND DIVISION. CAL JUDGMENT SECOND PART. CRITIQUE OF THE TELEOLOGICAL JUDGMENT Of the objective purposiveness of nature Of the divisions of an investigation into the feeling of the sublime OF THE MATHEMATICALLY SUBLIME Explanation of the term sublime Of that estimation of the magnitude of natural things which is requisite for the idea of the sublime Of the quality of the satisfaction in our judgments upon the sublime OF THE DYNAMICALLY SUBLIME IN NATURE Of nature regarded as might Of the modality of the judgment upon the sublime in nature GENERAL REMARK UPON THE EXPOSITION OF THE AESTHETICAL REFLECTIVE JUDGMENT DEDUCTION OF [PURE] AESTHETICAL JUDGMENTS The deduction of aesthetical judgments on the objects of nature must not be directed to what we call sublime in nature, but only to the beautiful