TY  - BOOK
AU  - Domingo, Rafael.
AU  - 
TI  - God and the Secular Legal System
SN  - 9781316601273
U1  - G41 23
PY  - 2017///
CY  - New York : 
PB  - Cambridge University Press
N1  - includes index and biblioraphy; 1 God as a metalegal concept ...23  1. Introduction ...23  2. God and gods ...25  3. Metalegal concepts ...29  4. God as a metalegal concept ...32  5 The legal recognition of god as a metalegal concept ...44  6. The religious objection ...49  7. The Dworkinian objection ...56  8. The moral objection ...60  9. The legal objection ...63  10. Religon, not god,as a matter of toleration ...65  11. Recovering the dialogue between theology and jurisprudence ...68  12. conclusion ...71  2 Religion as a constitutional limit of the secular legal system ....73  1. Introduction ...73  2. Legal identification of religion ...73  3. Suprartionality as the ultimate justification of the legal protection of religion ...79  4. The exclusion of suprartional acts from the secular legal system ...82  5. Tolerating suprarational law ...86  6. The suprarational argument as an irrelevant legal argument ...88  7. Structural dualism as a constitutional limit of the secular legal system ...92  8. The election of the dualistic model as a constitutional decision ....98  9. Autonomy and independence of religious communities ...104  10. Religious equality and equality of religions the false neutrality ...107  11. The right to religion ...113  12. The religious exception ...117  13. Conclusion ...120  3 Conscience as a private limit of the secular legal system ...122  1. Introduction ...122  2.Significance of conscience ...125  3. Conscience and dignity ...131  4. Puplic morality verus private morality ..133  5 Conscience as a private moral limit of the secular legal system ...136  6. Freedom of conscience : between freedom of thought and freeedom of religion ...138  7. Aright to religious and moral freedom ? ...142  8. Ethical independence verus moral authonomy ...146  9. Moral accommodation verus religious toleration ...151  10. Privilege of abstention and conscientious refusal ...155  11.Privilage of abstention verus religious exception ...161  12. Conclusion ...164
ER  -