000			02117nam a2200217 a 4500
999			_c3473 _d3473
001			nice12345678
003			Monogr.mrc
005			20211026115358.0
020			_c0
040			_cdc
082	0	0	_aG05.5 _bAL580
100			_aAllumpurath, George
245			_aAscription of Religious and of Religious Institutes According to CCEO / _cGeorge Allumpurath
260			_aRome : _bPontificium Institutum Orientale; _c2005.
300			_a87p
500			_aincludes index and biblioraphy
505	2		_aASCRIPTION AND GOVERNMENT OF A DEPENDENT MONASTERY, A HOUSE OR A PROVINCE OF A RELIGIOUS INSTITUTE ASCRIBED TO ANOTHER CHURCH SUIIURIS Notion of Ascription in the Eastern Code (CCEO)........................... 11 Legislation Preceding CCEO on Interecclesial Presence of Religious Institutes ............................................................................ 13 Codex Canonum Ecclesiarum Orientalium c. 432 ............................ 17 Ascription of a Part of a Religious Institute to Another Church Sui luris ................................................................................ 21 Effects of Ascription According to CCEO c. 432 ............................. 23 Destined and Ascribed ...................................................................... 40 The ¿Ius¿ to which the Ascribed House or Province is Subject ............................................................................ 41 Ascribed House or Province and the Possible Conflict Between the ¿Ius¿ ............................................................................. 42 A Particular Law for the Ascribed House or Province ..................... 44 Ascribed House or Province and Admissions from Another Church Sui luris .................................................................. 44 Permission to Erect a House and to Have It Ascribed ...................... 45 Institute of an Eastern Church and Ascribed House or Province ...... 45 A Case Study: Norbertines in Mananthavady ...................................46
902			_bFFS
942			_cBK _2ddc